Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
What constitutes a "pattern coin" to you?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="mlov43, post: 1732860, member: 16729"]I want to get a few opinions on what makes for a "pattern coin". </p><p><br /></p><p>The issue: There are some pattern coins that I see for sale from Guatemala at ebay. After inquiring with the seller, she/he told me that the coins were from the Guatemala Mint. That implies that they are "official" patterns. After doing a little googling using my limited Spanish, I find out that these coins were NOT made by that country's mint, but were presented to the Bank of Guatemala by an outside entitiy "as an example of material that could be used to manufacture currency" in Guatemala "<b>without the solicitation or acceptance</b> of the (Guatemala) Mint." A little more searching revealed that the Mint of Romania made them!</p><p><br /></p><p>The question: So, when an outside manufacturer, without solicitation, makes patterns in order to "fish for business" from a certain country (and is turned down), <b>would you consider those unsolicited/unaccepted coins as legitimate patterns</b>? Is there such a thing as a "legitimate" pattern?</p><p><br /></p><p>Now, if they WERE accepted by the Mint as patterns (but not subsequently used in any coin designs), does that make a difference? </p><p><br /></p><p>Even more interesting, I see that SCWC (39th edition) has these SAME tri-metallic versions of these coins listed as patterns.</p><p><br /></p><p>Your thoughts on this might help me decide whether or not to purchase one.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="mlov43, post: 1732860, member: 16729"]I want to get a few opinions on what makes for a "pattern coin". The issue: There are some pattern coins that I see for sale from Guatemala at ebay. After inquiring with the seller, she/he told me that the coins were from the Guatemala Mint. That implies that they are "official" patterns. After doing a little googling using my limited Spanish, I find out that these coins were NOT made by that country's mint, but were presented to the Bank of Guatemala by an outside entitiy "as an example of material that could be used to manufacture currency" in Guatemala "[B]without the solicitation or acceptance[/B] of the (Guatemala) Mint." A little more searching revealed that the Mint of Romania made them! The question: So, when an outside manufacturer, without solicitation, makes patterns in order to "fish for business" from a certain country (and is turned down), [B]would you consider those unsolicited/unaccepted coins as legitimate patterns[/B]? Is there such a thing as a "legitimate" pattern? Now, if they WERE accepted by the Mint as patterns (but not subsequently used in any coin designs), does that make a difference? Even more interesting, I see that SCWC (39th edition) has these SAME tri-metallic versions of these coins listed as patterns. Your thoughts on this might help me decide whether or not to purchase one.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
What constitutes a "pattern coin" to you?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...