Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;The Penny Lady®, post: 644022, member: 16948&quot;]I am interpreting Don&#039;s remarks differently than you are, so we&#039;ll just leave it at that.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>But as an example, the 1861 PCGS MS64 below to me is PQ for the grade.&nbsp; It has superior eye appeal, great strike, only one minor rev mark, no spots, and tons of luster for an MS64 grade, so I feel this coin deserves a PQ designation, it may even possibly upgrade.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>And compare it to the NGC MS65 1861 (yes, I understand PCGS and NGC may have different grading criteria, but that is a discussion for another day).&nbsp; I think the NGC 1861 is properly graded at MS65, however, not PQ - it has subdued luster especially compared to the PCGS MS64, and also has weak feathertips, a light spot, but no marks.&nbsp; What are your thoughts on these?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in