Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
What about Mên ?...the god..not the male humans!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="kirispupis, post: 8051029, member: 118780"]I finally found some info by searching for "lunus", which is another name for Mên. I also found an article about Mithra from <a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/Mithraism" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/Mithraism" rel="nofollow">Britannica</a>, which states that by the time Alexander conquered Persia, Mithraism was pretty much done - or at least from the ruling class (and Amastris was the niece of Darius III). This would seem to make Mithra unlikely.</p><p><br /></p><p>However, <a href="https://www.rosieanderson.net/post/men-pharnakou" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.rosieanderson.net/post/men-pharnakou" rel="nofollow">this</a> article makes a much different point, essentially saying that at the time of Pharnaces, worship of Mithra was common in the area (Mithridates) and that <i>he</i> introduced the worship of Mên there. What I find even more intriguing is the image of the Pharnaces gold coin. The sun and crescent moon are almost <i>exactly</i> the same as those on my coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>So, I'm less inclined to think this is Mên, but I'm still not sure this is Mithra. Perhaps the sun and moon <i>referenced</i> Mithra, but the obverse was someone else (such as Amastris herself). Pharnaces did put his own image on his coins, though that was much later.</p><p><br /></p><p>I'm actually wondering if she was brave enough to use her own image. After all, she did literally write "Queen Amastris" on her coins. That was already risky.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="kirispupis, post: 8051029, member: 118780"]I finally found some info by searching for "lunus", which is another name for Mên. I also found an article about Mithra from [URL='https://www.britannica.com/topic/Mithraism']Britannica[/URL], which states that by the time Alexander conquered Persia, Mithraism was pretty much done - or at least from the ruling class (and Amastris was the niece of Darius III). This would seem to make Mithra unlikely. However, [URL='https://www.rosieanderson.net/post/men-pharnakou']this[/URL] article makes a much different point, essentially saying that at the time of Pharnaces, worship of Mithra was common in the area (Mithridates) and that [I]he[/I] introduced the worship of Mên there. What I find even more intriguing is the image of the Pharnaces gold coin. The sun and crescent moon are almost [I]exactly[/I] the same as those on my coin. So, I'm less inclined to think this is Mên, but I'm still not sure this is Mithra. Perhaps the sun and moon [I]referenced[/I] Mithra, but the obverse was someone else (such as Amastris herself). Pharnaces did put his own image on his coins, though that was much later. I'm actually wondering if she was brave enough to use her own image. After all, she did literally write "Queen Amastris" on her coins. That was already risky.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
What about Mên ?...the god..not the male humans!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...