Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
What a difference a dot makes (on a siliqua)
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="kevin McGonigal, post: 8343321, member: 72790"]I am not that much interested in coinage of the late Roman Empire, but the siliquae of that period are pretty attractive coins and some of the earlier ones were of the weight and fineness of First Century AD denarii. Handsome coins, these siliquae. I have a few of these below. I don't know if there is anything unusual about them. I never paid any attention to the "dots" mentioned above. If anyone more familiar with these coins notices anything notable about any of them please tell me. Thanks</p><p><br /></p><p>From top left, a "heavy" siliqua of Constantius II, weighing 3.39 g. No dots but there seems to be a tiny C.B. at the bottom, whatever that might mean or stand for. Sear 3936. Next is siliqua of Julian II, weighing 2.6 g. Sear 4071. Third up is one of Valentinian at 1.8 g, Sear 4097. Bottom left, a coin of Valens, Sear 4112 at 2.1 g F Fifth up is a later siliqua of Honorius and by that time the siliqua was close to 1 gram in weight. This one is 1.2 g and is CRS 826. Lastly is a very well clipped one of Honorius , actually a pretty good image but weighing only .8 grams and is Sear 4150. I think his silver is found more clipped than not. [ATTACH=full]1479752[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1479754[/ATTACH] Again, as I don't pay as much attention to later Roman Imperial coinage as other areas. If I have an error or interesting fact I missed please feel free to mention it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="kevin McGonigal, post: 8343321, member: 72790"]I am not that much interested in coinage of the late Roman Empire, but the siliquae of that period are pretty attractive coins and some of the earlier ones were of the weight and fineness of First Century AD denarii. Handsome coins, these siliquae. I have a few of these below. I don't know if there is anything unusual about them. I never paid any attention to the "dots" mentioned above. If anyone more familiar with these coins notices anything notable about any of them please tell me. Thanks From top left, a "heavy" siliqua of Constantius II, weighing 3.39 g. No dots but there seems to be a tiny C.B. at the bottom, whatever that might mean or stand for. Sear 3936. Next is siliqua of Julian II, weighing 2.6 g. Sear 4071. Third up is one of Valentinian at 1.8 g, Sear 4097. Bottom left, a coin of Valens, Sear 4112 at 2.1 g F Fifth up is a later siliqua of Honorius and by that time the siliqua was close to 1 gram in weight. This one is 1.2 g and is CRS 826. Lastly is a very well clipped one of Honorius , actually a pretty good image but weighing only .8 grams and is Sear 4150. I think his silver is found more clipped than not. [ATTACH=full]1479752[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1479754[/ATTACH] Again, as I don't pay as much attention to later Roman Imperial coinage as other areas. If I have an error or interesting fact I missed please feel free to mention it.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
What a difference a dot makes (on a siliqua)
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...