Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;zumbly, post: 2524572, member: 57495&quot;]A small point to note if you care about attribution numbers (honestly, not everyone does)... you&#039;ll notice that in the link Mikey provided for his example, the RIC number given is RIC II (Vespasian) 957, whereas what you have in yours is RIC 242.&nbsp; The number you&#039;ve used is for the earlier edition of RIC that covers this period, which has since been superseded a new edition that was published in 2007, so the numbers have changed.&nbsp; The link also shows the correct obverse legend - CAESAR AVG <b>F</b> DOMITIANVS. </p><p><br /></p><p>Anyway, nice choice for a first ancient!&nbsp; I like the reverse type and have one similar that was issued some years earlier, but with an anepigraphic reverse.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]538693[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>DOMITIAN, as Caesar</b></p><p>AR Denarius. 3.1g, 19mm. Rome mint, AD 73-75. RIC II (Vespasian) 680. O: CAES AVG F DOMIT COS II, laureate head right. R: Domitian, togate, on rearing horse left, raising right hand and brandishing (eagle-tipped or human-headed??) sceptre in left.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in