Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Notaphylic_C, post: 8278584, member: 130786&quot;]-It&#039;s interesting that you did your own research (not many collectors do). However, you have to remember that consensus (a number of sitings/research findings) from all over the US can be more accurate than one&#039;s findings from a particular area. If note distribution just came out from your area, than I would be willing to bet on your findings (but that&#039;s not the way banknotes are issued).&nbsp; That being said, however, I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve made some interesting observations as clearly you put a lot of thought into your findings.</p><p>I have studied prefixes from the 2013 Bank of Canada polymer Tens. With a combination of my data &amp; data I&#039;ve seen on an online database, I have concluded that a certain FTH prefix with the Macklem-Carney signature is very scarce (13 notes have been reported). Despite this, &amp; 673 FTH notes with the newer 2nd signature combo, our catalogue continues to publish &amp; list the 2nd prefix as being more scarce (higher BV)! So, these things can be quite frustrating. </p><p>I have never been a big fan of Devil Face 1954 notes (printed in the millions) but b/c world demand is so high, their BV eclipse all logic. So demand is often more important than the facts.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in