Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;sketcherpbr, post: 480629, member: 15350&quot;]This may or may not have already been asked in a previous thread, but if such a thread exists, it was up a good bit ago.&nbsp; But maybe it wasn&#039;t = )</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>There are some coins I look at and wonder whether it was weakly struck or if it has been worn, and I often can&#039;t arrive at a conclusion.&nbsp; I know that some coins are notorious for having a weak strike (cough PEACE cough), and that it&#039;s a natural thing that happens when the die has been used past its prime/needs to be cleaned (I think that&#039;s right).&nbsp; </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I can&#039;t help but wonder if there are any examples you can think of where a coin was undergraded or underappreciated because it was thought to be worn, instead of a having weak strike?&nbsp; I find it hard to believe I&#039;m the only one that&#039;s having difficult in this area...:rolling:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Thanks!</p><p>-Peter[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in