Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;brg5658, post: 1671789, member: 29751&quot;]Changing the &quot;exposure&quot; of the images doesn&#039;t help.&nbsp; Retake the photos and actually put some light on the COIN. :scratch:&nbsp; You can&#039;t fix bad photography in post-processing in this case.</p><p><br /></p><p>My problem with the coin being a 65 is the obverse.&nbsp; The pictures you posted are not good, so I&#039;m only going from what I can see.&nbsp; But, I see lots of marks, and I really dislike the spotting and white crud that appears to be muting the luster in the entire lower left quadrant (6 o&#039;clock to 9 o&#039;clock).&nbsp; When I first opened your post, my eyes read &quot;MS63&quot; on the holder pictures -- and I thought, &quot;that&#039;s a nice looking MS63 common Morgan&quot;.&nbsp; Then, I read your post, and realized the holder said MS65.&nbsp; My thoughts were then, &quot;Wow, that&#039;s a low end MS65 Morgan, looks MS64 to me&quot;.&nbsp; I honestly think your coin would not CAC -- that is, it is in my eyes a low-end &quot;C&quot; quality MS65 coin <b><u>at best</u></b>.</p><p><br /></p><p>To each his/her own I guess.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in