Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Tom B, post: 2151896, member: 11854&quot;]I love silver WQs, but your minimum grade is too high at MS65+ simply because the 1932-D is going to swamp the value of the set.&nbsp; Only two of these have been graded MS65+ and the last sold for $41k at auction and there are only two MS66 pieces and the last sold for $143k at auction.&nbsp; You would have to stay at MS65 or lower for the minimum unless your funds, and patience, are near limitless.</p><p><br /></p><p>I also agree with PCGS for the series since they generally have much more market liquidity and PCGS, in my opinion, grades this series more consistently (on average) and perhaps a half-point tighter in the MS grades than NGC.&nbsp; However, keeping them all in one generation slab would be problematic, at best, and foolish, at worst.&nbsp; It would be foolish to pass a spectacular coin at a fair price simply because the generation holder did not meet what you chose.&nbsp; Of course, you might always reholder or regrade your coins once you acquire them and this will assure you of having them all in the same holder.&nbsp; Instead of requiring the same holder, have you thought of having your coins imaged and then placing them in a virtual album or virtual holder so that they all have a consistent presentation?</p><p><br /></p><p>I love this series and you will need dedication, deep pockets, discipline and lots of luck to complete a fabulous set.&nbsp; I have been heavily into WQs (the only modern series I am intimately familiar with) since the early-to-mid-1990s and have watched as it morphed from the outer most boondocks to the hottest commodity and back to somewhere in between with a devoted and deep following.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in