Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Was This Out of Line?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Tom B, post: 1516251, member: 11854"]The seller may have acquired the coin directly from Heritage after viewing auction lots in-hand and realizing the coin was nicer than portrayed in the Heritage images. In cases such as these, the people who make the time and expend the effort and resources to view lots in-hand have a great advantage over those who rely on an internet purchase and all the conveniences that the internet provides. Therefore, his possible expenditure of resources may have allowed him to acquire the coin at a level lower than it may have realized with better images, with a return policy or with an in-hand inspection. A buyer can never be entitled to a single bid increment increase upon purchase of a coin that was in a prior auction, but if the coin fit the description written above then the coin might reasonably be priced at far higher than a one bid increment increase. </p><p><br /></p><p>I have a real example of this that happened to me during the Heritage FUN auction at Tampa, FL in January, 2011. I took the time and spent my resources to attend the show and examine lots in-hand. Of course, this is my business so it was a business expense. Two lots in the auction were <i>far nicer </i> than the images suggested and I won both lots. One of those lots was for a circulated Seated Liberty dime that has a <i>Greysheet </i> bid of about $40, but routinely sells for around $80. I won this dime for $75 and subsequently listed it on my website at $125. Within a day of having the coin listed, with very good images that I had taken, I had three folks request to purchase the dime. However, one of those potential buyers told me that he thought the 67% potential profit was excessive and that I should reduce my sales price. His reasoning on 67% was the $50 difference in the Heritage sales price and my listed price. I kindly pointed out to him that Heritage charges $14 <i>minimum per lot </i> won, which raised the price to $89. Further, the auction closed after the show closed and I was not in attendance in Tampa, FL when it closed so Heritage charged me approximatley $12 per coin to ship the coins to me, which then raised my cost to $101 for the coin. Finally, I pay for shipping and insurance on coins sent to clients, which means that the coin likely cost me $107 out of pocket before a client even examined the piece in-hand. All of a sudden, my $125 asking price seemed quite modest for a superb coin.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Tom B, post: 1516251, member: 11854"]The seller may have acquired the coin directly from Heritage after viewing auction lots in-hand and realizing the coin was nicer than portrayed in the Heritage images. In cases such as these, the people who make the time and expend the effort and resources to view lots in-hand have a great advantage over those who rely on an internet purchase and all the conveniences that the internet provides. Therefore, his possible expenditure of resources may have allowed him to acquire the coin at a level lower than it may have realized with better images, with a return policy or with an in-hand inspection. A buyer can never be entitled to a single bid increment increase upon purchase of a coin that was in a prior auction, but if the coin fit the description written above then the coin might reasonably be priced at far higher than a one bid increment increase. I have a real example of this that happened to me during the Heritage FUN auction at Tampa, FL in January, 2011. I took the time and spent my resources to attend the show and examine lots in-hand. Of course, this is my business so it was a business expense. Two lots in the auction were [i]far nicer [/i] than the images suggested and I won both lots. One of those lots was for a circulated Seated Liberty dime that has a [i]Greysheet [/i] bid of about $40, but routinely sells for around $80. I won this dime for $75 and subsequently listed it on my website at $125. Within a day of having the coin listed, with very good images that I had taken, I had three folks request to purchase the dime. However, one of those potential buyers told me that he thought the 67% potential profit was excessive and that I should reduce my sales price. His reasoning on 67% was the $50 difference in the Heritage sales price and my listed price. I kindly pointed out to him that Heritage charges $14 [i]minimum per lot [/i] won, which raised the price to $89. Further, the auction closed after the show closed and I was not in attendance in Tampa, FL when it closed so Heritage charged me approximatley $12 per coin to ship the coins to me, which then raised my cost to $101 for the coin. Finally, I pay for shipping and insurance on coins sent to clients, which means that the coin likely cost me $107 out of pocket before a client even examined the piece in-hand. All of a sudden, my $125 asking price seemed quite modest for a superb coin.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Was This Out of Line?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...