Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Speedy, post: 112875, member: 705&quot;]I&#039;m sorry but we are going to have to agree to disagree.....luster/toning/etc most definteily have a large part in grading and should.</p><p>Again....read that book I sent online...it shows and talks about this topic.</p><p>One reason why luster should be taken in with grading IMO is because it can point to cleaning....you can have a coin with UNC detail but has no or dull luster...that points to cleaning...if we didn&#039;t take that into grading we would be calling that coin UNC and not AU like it should be.</p><p><br /></p><p>Speedy[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in