Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Was my coin graded improperly by PCGS?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="mrbrklyn, post: 112269, member: 4381"]It's not a matter of thinking differently, but thinking objectively.</p><p><br /></p><p>This doesn't hold up to objective evaluation. There is no "natual" coin. (there are no more natural apples either but that is a different discussion). It is pure and unprovable speculation where any deviation from perfection is obtained. You have no clue if it is in the mint, in the bag, in the truck, in storage at the treasury, or because the coin fell on the subway plaform.</p><p><br /></p><p>What you do have is a coin which is measurably and objectively deviant from an asumed perfect state. This is the first rule of scientific observation. Observe and measure what is in front of you with defined precision and accuracy.</p><p><br /></p><p>Consider this, within the FIRST page of the linked book!</p><p><br /></p><p>"To put things into better perspective. in fewer than 15 years, a MINT STATE-65 coin has gone from being an above average mint state coin (approximately I out of 2 or 3) to being a choice or gem coin (perhaps I out of 25!). The reason for this change is that there has never been a standard for grading mint state coins. If the pricing guides said that a MINT STATE-65 Barber Quarter was worth $3,000, then a Barber Quarter worth $3,000 was "today's" Mint State-65. That didn't mean the same coin would be tomorrow's MINT STATE-65, when the pricing guides say $5,000, nor did it mean that coin was last year's MINT STATE-65, when the pricing guides listed MS-65 Barber Quarters at $2,000."</p><p><br /></p><p>Consider this the next time you bid for a coin in an old PCGS slab...</p><p><br /></p><p>Doug, experienced fellows like you and I know that 15 years is a blink of an eye.</p><p><br /></p><p>There is to much effort and time wasted on making subjective evaluations on damage. So a MS68 1881 Morgan O is not held to the same standards as a 1881P because of weak strikes.</p><p><br /></p><p>Man, aside from the fact that weak strikes are UGLY, let the grading BE. If there are no MS69 coins from New Orlean's, the MARKET can worry about the value. The grader needs to plainly grade off of the one and only objective standard.</p><p><br /></p><p>The whole MS needs to be taken away for the grade. The grade is 68, or 70, or 58 because of a sratch... not body bagged.</p><p><br /></p><p>The only time a coin should be body bagged is when it was artificially enhanced, or damaged with the intention to fool the buyer (ie Whizzing it)</p><p><br /></p><p>Ruben[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="mrbrklyn, post: 112269, member: 4381"]It's not a matter of thinking differently, but thinking objectively. This doesn't hold up to objective evaluation. There is no "natual" coin. (there are no more natural apples either but that is a different discussion). It is pure and unprovable speculation where any deviation from perfection is obtained. You have no clue if it is in the mint, in the bag, in the truck, in storage at the treasury, or because the coin fell on the subway plaform. What you do have is a coin which is measurably and objectively deviant from an asumed perfect state. This is the first rule of scientific observation. Observe and measure what is in front of you with defined precision and accuracy. Consider this, within the FIRST page of the linked book! "To put things into better perspective. in fewer than 15 years, a MINT STATE-65 coin has gone from being an above average mint state coin (approximately I out of 2 or 3) to being a choice or gem coin (perhaps I out of 25!). The reason for this change is that there has never been a standard for grading mint state coins. If the pricing guides said that a MINT STATE-65 Barber Quarter was worth $3,000, then a Barber Quarter worth $3,000 was "today's" Mint State-65. That didn't mean the same coin would be tomorrow's MINT STATE-65, when the pricing guides say $5,000, nor did it mean that coin was last year's MINT STATE-65, when the pricing guides listed MS-65 Barber Quarters at $2,000." Consider this the next time you bid for a coin in an old PCGS slab... Doug, experienced fellows like you and I know that 15 years is a blink of an eye. There is to much effort and time wasted on making subjective evaluations on damage. So a MS68 1881 Morgan O is not held to the same standards as a 1881P because of weak strikes. Man, aside from the fact that weak strikes are UGLY, let the grading BE. If there are no MS69 coins from New Orlean's, the MARKET can worry about the value. The grader needs to plainly grade off of the one and only objective standard. The whole MS needs to be taken away for the grade. The grade is 68, or 70, or 58 because of a sratch... not body bagged. The only time a coin should be body bagged is when it was artificially enhanced, or damaged with the intention to fool the buyer (ie Whizzing it) Ruben[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Was my coin graded improperly by PCGS?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...