I picked these up a while ago but I have been unsure since I got them whether they are proofs or not. Here's my reasons for thinking they're proof and not proof. Proof: They all have a solid strike and quite a few coins have squared rims. They all have a fingerprint on the obverse side, which is common for proofs that used to be in the presentation boxes. Not Proof: They don't have that proof shine I'm used to seeing. But I also know australian proofs have some that are more matte and flat then others. So I just want your opinion. Sorry the photos are in plastic.
For your sake, I hope they are... I'm guessing probably not. I had some New Zealand Half Crowns and Florins that I thought were proofs, too. They look just like yours, if your photos are accurate to life. One of mine looks a lot more "proof" than yours, but it is not...
I'm afraid you're right. The Florin and sixpence look a lot more like proofs then the other two. I've just been hoping that they all were. But I think they're just a nice MS set.