Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
WAMs and CAMs on Lincolns
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="jcuve, post: 710907, member: 13945"]<span style="color: Black">I appreciate the positive commentary, nominations and additional information that everyone has provided. Now I have a few final thoughts and comments to close this thread out. </span></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: Black">In regards to the 1999 WAM, there have been four (4) dies identified and illustrated by G. J. Lawson with further micro-photography by Ken Potter that be found <span style="color: #000000"><b><a href="http://koinpro.tripod.com/Articles/1999_1c_Rev_Dies.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://koinpro.tripod.com/Articles/1999_1c_Rev_Dies.htm" rel="nofollow"><span style="color: #000000">HERE</span></a></b></span>. Word is that the 1998 and 2000 WAMs were struck by many more dies – these are reportedly being studied, listed and documented. </span></p><p> </p><p> <span style="color: Black"><span style="color: #000000">From what can be gathered there appears to be a unique die used for the 1992P & D CAMs, and the 1998S & 1999S proof CAMs. Dr. Wiles has documented the <b><u><a href="http://varietyvista.com/1992DRDV007%20cent.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://varietyvista.com/1992DRDV007%20cent.htm" rel="nofollow"><span style="color: #000000">1992D</span></a></u></b> CAM and proof CAMs <b><a href="http://varietyvista.com/1998SRDV007%20cent.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://varietyvista.com/1998SRDV007%20cent.htm" rel="nofollow"><span style="color: #000000">1998S</span></a></b> & <b><a href="http://varietyvista.com/1999SRDV007%20cent.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://varietyvista.com/1999SRDV007%20cent.htm" rel="nofollow"><span style="color: #000000">1999S</span></a></b>. </span></span></p><p><br /></p><p> <span style="color: Black"><span style="color: #000000">Dr. Wiles has documented two (2) dies used for the 1988D reverse of ’89 (RDV-006.1 & 006.2) found <b><a href="http://varietyvista.com/1988DRDV0061%20cent.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://varietyvista.com/1988DRDV0061%20cent.htm" rel="nofollow"><span style="color: #000000">HERE</span></a>. </b>Dr Wiles has also documented five (5) dies used for the 1988P reverse of ’89, <b><a href="http://varietyvista.com/1988PRDV0061%20cent.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://varietyvista.com/1988PRDV0061%20cent.htm" rel="nofollow"><span style="color: #000000">HERE</span></a></b>. </span></span></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: Black"><span style="color: #000000">In light of additional information and the absence of an example to study, the 1996 WAM should be repudiated until which time the original or a subsequent example is identified and studied. As has been stated the purported 1995 with wide AM was studied and determined to be a marriage magic coin parts and documented by Charles Daughtrey <b><a href="http://www.coincommunity.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=42000&whichpage=3" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.coincommunity.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=42000&whichpage=3" rel="nofollow"><span style="color: #000000">HERE</span></a></b>. The possibility of finding another magic coin with an incorrect obverse – reverse combination appears high and any examples found will have to be thoroughly scrutinized. </span></span></p><p> </p><p> <span style="color: Black"><span style="color: #000000">Here is a picture of the obverse of the 1999S CAM (that was mistakenly not attached in the beginning). </span></span></p><p><span style="color: Black"><span style="color: #000000"></span></span><span style="color: Black"></span></p><p><span style="color: Black"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: Black"><img src="http://i732.photobucket.com/albums/ww322/jcuve/1999_pr_CAMe2.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></span></p><p><span style="color: Black"></span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="jcuve, post: 710907, member: 13945"][COLOR=Black]I appreciate the positive commentary, nominations and additional information that everyone has provided. Now I have a few final thoughts and comments to close this thread out. [/COLOR] [COLOR=Black]In regards to the 1999 WAM, there have been four (4) dies identified and illustrated by G. J. Lawson with further micro-photography by Ken Potter that be found [COLOR=#000000][B][URL="http://koinpro.tripod.com/Articles/1999_1c_Rev_Dies.htm"][COLOR=#000000]HERE[/COLOR][/URL][/B][/COLOR]. Word is that the 1998 and 2000 WAMs were struck by many more dies – these are reportedly being studied, listed and documented. [/COLOR] [COLOR=Black][COLOR=#000000]From what can be gathered there appears to be a unique die used for the 1992P & D CAMs, and the 1998S & 1999S proof CAMs. Dr. Wiles has documented the [B][U][URL="http://varietyvista.com/1992DRDV007%20cent.htm"][COLOR=#000000]1992D[/COLOR][/URL][/U][/B] CAM and proof CAMs [B][URL="http://varietyvista.com/1998SRDV007%20cent.htm"][COLOR=#000000]1998S[/COLOR][/URL][/B] & [B][URL="http://varietyvista.com/1999SRDV007%20cent.htm"][COLOR=#000000]1999S[/COLOR][/URL][/B]. [/COLOR][/COLOR] [COLOR=Black][COLOR=#000000]Dr. Wiles has documented two (2) dies used for the 1988D reverse of ’89 (RDV-006.1 & 006.2) found [B][URL="http://varietyvista.com/1988DRDV0061%20cent.htm"][COLOR=#000000]HERE[/COLOR][/URL]. [/B]Dr Wiles has also documented five (5) dies used for the 1988P reverse of ’89, [B][URL="http://varietyvista.com/1988PRDV0061%20cent.htm"][COLOR=#000000]HERE[/COLOR][/URL][/B]. [/COLOR][/COLOR] [COLOR=Black][COLOR=#000000]In light of additional information and the absence of an example to study, the 1996 WAM should be repudiated until which time the original or a subsequent example is identified and studied. As has been stated the purported 1995 with wide AM was studied and determined to be a marriage magic coin parts and documented by Charles Daughtrey [B][URL="http://www.coincommunity.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=42000&whichpage=3"][COLOR=#000000]HERE[/COLOR][/URL][/B]. The possibility of finding another magic coin with an incorrect obverse – reverse combination appears high and any examples found will have to be thoroughly scrutinized. [/COLOR][/COLOR] [COLOR=Black][COLOR=#000000]Here is a picture of the obverse of the 1999S CAM (that was mistakenly not attached in the beginning). [/COLOR][/COLOR][COLOR=Black] [/COLOR] [COLOR=Black][IMG]http://i732.photobucket.com/albums/ww322/jcuve/1999_pr_CAMe2.jpg[/IMG] [/COLOR][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
WAMs and CAMs on Lincolns
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...