Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Vicious Little Achaemenid King
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="medoraman, post: 2137347, member: 26302"]Nice Type II Doug. Bill Daehn in his paper, (unfortunately for some reason its not on our website, I will try to correct that), goes over all 4 Types. He believes Type I was issued during Darius' handling of uprisings around Lydia after they took them over. Later, when they had time to properly construct a coinage, they struck the Type II's to pay for Greek mercenaries and also introduce a gold coinage system. So basically the Type I was an "emergency" coin to pay to suppress revolts and struck on the previous weight standards. Later, when they developed their own standards and conversion system between gold and silver, did Type II's get struck. Also, no gold Type I's were struck, but were struck for Type II-IV.</p><p> </p><p>You are also right the Type II is scarcer than III and IV. Type I's are usually listed as rare, but since there are at least 123 known now, I am not sure if that is really a "rare" ancient. What do you guys think? Is 123 for an ancient coin "rare" or simply "scarce"?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="medoraman, post: 2137347, member: 26302"]Nice Type II Doug. Bill Daehn in his paper, (unfortunately for some reason its not on our website, I will try to correct that), goes over all 4 Types. He believes Type I was issued during Darius' handling of uprisings around Lydia after they took them over. Later, when they had time to properly construct a coinage, they struck the Type II's to pay for Greek mercenaries and also introduce a gold coinage system. So basically the Type I was an "emergency" coin to pay to suppress revolts and struck on the previous weight standards. Later, when they developed their own standards and conversion system between gold and silver, did Type II's get struck. Also, no gold Type I's were struck, but were struck for Type II-IV. You are also right the Type II is scarcer than III and IV. Type I's are usually listed as rare, but since there are at least 123 known now, I am not sure if that is really a "rare" ancient. What do you guys think? Is 123 for an ancient coin "rare" or simply "scarce"?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Vicious Little Achaemenid King
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...