Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Vespasian 'Dream Coin'
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Lolli, post: 3564653, member: 96900"]"I want to see quotations page numbers and real sources. An opinion without support is not worth very much in my view."</p><p><br /></p><p>So if I publish much about coins I must be a god in authenticating and if I do not publish anything I must be bad in authenticating ?</p><p><br /></p><p>It would be another case if it would be about articles concerning fakes and the IMPACT FACTOR of article, reputation of magazine where they article was published and quotes of this articles. Non of your friend has published any article abount fakes so ...^^</p><p>If you publish something it should be new to be interesting for others but it is not smart to give away not know informations about fakes because knowledge is might and it is very hard to get this information so to give it to others for free is not that smart. If you write a seminar paper or dissertation work at university you will have to write in history and most other subjects about a question that has not been answered so far or at least not detailed so you can not cheat by copy + past <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie3" alt=":(" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>I think the rate of fake coins you manage to get withdrawn from reputbale auction houses is a better way to judge authentication skills and the more expensive and better the fake the better the authentication skills.</p><p>And there I am expremely good !</p><p><br /></p><p>The epxerts of auction houses are smarter they do care about arguments and not so much about names. I wrote for example one time the coin is a published fake condemned by Silvia Hurter as fake from modern dies, Silva Hurter was one of the best in authenticating fakes but he did not care. Then I wrote again that the die axis is wrong and impossible for issue and mentioned related literature he thanked me and said what a useful hint and after he verified it the coin was withdrawn.</p><p><br /></p><p>Smart people care about arguements only !</p><p>And smart people can express their opinion with arguments.</p><p><br /></p><p>I have written my arguments already and because you can not disprove them you try to go after me <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>EXPLAIN ME WHY DO ALL COINS FROM THIS DIES HAVE SAME FLAN SHAPE CENTERING AND WEAR ????</p><p><br /></p><p>Next one, all coins from this dies have same flan shape+ centering + wear this can not be a coincidence !!!</p><p><br /></p><p>On the new one a part of the edge was later cutted out to distract.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=493816" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=493816" rel="nofollow">https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=493816</a></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]948038[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The problem is that if the same coin would have been posted by another possibly new member the opinions concerning authenticity would he most likely completely different knowing about the cast twins. </p><p><br /></p><p>So this is more about the owner and pedigree as about the coin itself which is stupid.</p><p><br /></p><p>If a coin is imho authentic I can find enough arguments for authenticity to defend the coin so this should not be any problem here for the others to find real arguments speaking for the authenticity of the coin if the coin would is actually authentic.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Lolli, post: 3564653, member: 96900"]"I want to see quotations page numbers and real sources. An opinion without support is not worth very much in my view." So if I publish much about coins I must be a god in authenticating and if I do not publish anything I must be bad in authenticating ? It would be another case if it would be about articles concerning fakes and the IMPACT FACTOR of article, reputation of magazine where they article was published and quotes of this articles. Non of your friend has published any article abount fakes so ...^^ If you publish something it should be new to be interesting for others but it is not smart to give away not know informations about fakes because knowledge is might and it is very hard to get this information so to give it to others for free is not that smart. If you write a seminar paper or dissertation work at university you will have to write in history and most other subjects about a question that has not been answered so far or at least not detailed so you can not cheat by copy + past :( I think the rate of fake coins you manage to get withdrawn from reputbale auction houses is a better way to judge authentication skills and the more expensive and better the fake the better the authentication skills. And there I am expremely good ! The epxerts of auction houses are smarter they do care about arguments and not so much about names. I wrote for example one time the coin is a published fake condemned by Silvia Hurter as fake from modern dies, Silva Hurter was one of the best in authenticating fakes but he did not care. Then I wrote again that the die axis is wrong and impossible for issue and mentioned related literature he thanked me and said what a useful hint and after he verified it the coin was withdrawn. Smart people care about arguements only ! And smart people can express their opinion with arguments. I have written my arguments already and because you can not disprove them you try to go after me ;) EXPLAIN ME WHY DO ALL COINS FROM THIS DIES HAVE SAME FLAN SHAPE CENTERING AND WEAR ???? Next one, all coins from this dies have same flan shape+ centering + wear this can not be a coincidence !!! On the new one a part of the edge was later cutted out to distract. [url]https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=493816[/url] [ATTACH=full]948038[/ATTACH] The problem is that if the same coin would have been posted by another possibly new member the opinions concerning authenticity would he most likely completely different knowing about the cast twins. So this is more about the owner and pedigree as about the coin itself which is stupid. If a coin is imho authentic I can find enough arguments for authenticity to defend the coin so this should not be any problem here for the others to find real arguments speaking for the authenticity of the coin if the coin would is actually authentic.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Vespasian 'Dream Coin'
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...