Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;imrich, post: 20654156, member: 22331&quot;]You&#039;re being facetious, and with due respect we know, but don&#039;t quite understand you speaking in absolutes, when I hadn&#039;t even closely inferred same!</p><p><br /></p><p>My statement was: &quot;possibly improving availability of properly graded coins.&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>As I&#039;ve previously explained CAC is being criticized for correctly showing coins being at least an average of a &quot;Top Tier&quot; TPGs&#039; improper grading range.</p><p><br /></p><p>Their improper current grading range is MS60-67, with the average being &lt;MS64, so a coin meeting MS64+ proper standard, but having a MS66-67 TPG assigned &quot;Market&quot; grade could garner a &quot;bean&quot;/criticism.</p><p><br /></p><p>That same scarce date/condition coin could correctly be sent back to CAC, possibly receiving a reasonable new MS65 CAC grade!</p><p><br /></p><p>I have multiples of these scarce Gold coins which were incorrectly graded, that may easily sell at 2 grades lower, because of their past limited availability, but new respectable pricing.</p><p><br /></p><p>JMHO[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in