Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Pandacollector, post: 972490, member: 26583&quot;]Mr. Rim&#039;s Cents,</p><p>I guess I&#039;m just really sloooow, but post #66 is about hearsay evidence. By pointing me to post #66 it seems you are implying that the following chain of events is hearsay: 1) I write to alderwood. That is first person 2) I receive a response from alderwood. That is first person. His response - dated and time stamped - is about contacting eBay. Receiving the email is first person, the veracity of its contents is undetermined without a legal corroboration from Mr. alderwood. That part is currently hearsay but could be admissible if Mr. alderwood confirmed it under oath, yes?&nbsp; 3) eBay removes Cheetah&#039;s listing within minutes. That is an observable fact by anybody. So it seems circumstantial that Cheetah&#039;s auction was pulled minutes after I got Mr. alderwood&#039;s email. So please bear with me, you are saying that this entire chain of events - including all my first person experiences - is inadmissible because it is hearsay? Thanks for your answer and I promise not to ask anything further on this topic.</p><p><br /></p><p>By the way, I do read what you write and take it seriously (see post #78). I also get a kick out of how you spell my name.</p><p><br /></p><p>Best wishes,</p><p>Peter Anthony</p><p><a href="http://www.pandacollector.com/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.pandacollector.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pandacollector.com/</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in