Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;messydesk, post: 3203925, member: 1765&quot;]The die cracks below the digits give it away, so one of two things happened.&nbsp; </p><ul> <li>The VAM 1A reverse die was used with both a normal obverse and the repunched 6 obverse and the die chip was never cataloged with the VAM 2 obverse.</li> <li>The VAM 1A is cataloged incorrectly.&nbsp; If all coins with the VAM 2 obverse have this break by the wreath, then it makes sense just to mention the chip as part of the VAM 2 listing.&nbsp; If the reverse die chip developed while the die was paired with the VAM 2 obverse, then there should be a VAM 2 and 2A listing, with VAM 2A referring to the die break.</li> </ul><p>There is someone who has made it a hobby to go through high grade photos from Heritage and CoinFacts and try to straighten out the listings for the better date Morgans.&nbsp; I don&#039;t think he&#039;s done 96-S yet, though.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in