Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;jlblonde, post: 1296990, member: 32000&quot;]You right. Those facts are outdated.</p><p><br /></p><p>North America may now have a forth country, Greenland. </p><p><br /></p><p>For the purposes of cataloging my collection I placed these areas under Small European States and Territories. It made sense to me because having a 1&quot; binder for the Falklands and Saint Helena under Atlantic countries and areas seemed a waste of space. I simply drew upon my old schooling from 20 years ago. </p><p><br /></p><p>I have seen some collections place Hawaii and US/Philippines in the Pacific Island nations while others have it in American collections. </p><p><br /></p><p>But in the end I suppose your are right. Political leanings and personal feelings aside, those countries and or territories should be placed in their respective geographical areas. </p><p><br /></p><p>Example: When the Soviet Union was dismantled, new countries such as Turkmenistan were cataloged under Russian Commonwealth of Nations in some books. Now they fall under their own, Central Asian Nations.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in