Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SuperDave, post: 2472706, member: 1892&quot;]Insider. I have little use for those who do not allow fact to influence their opinions.</p><p><br /></p><p>If it quacks, it&#039;s a duck. The mint mark on your coin is of the same size and in the same location as a Large S. It isn&#039;t shaped the same way, although the PCGS coin I posted has hints of something similar. </p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m not declaring specifically what it <b>is</b>, just that blindly calling it a &quot;Small S&quot; based purely on the shape is to deny <b>fact</b>. </p><p><br /></p><p>In fact, right now the strongest hypothesis - the one which accommodates <i>all</i> the known facts - is that it&#039;s a previously-unknown mint mark punch as large as a Large and shaped like a Small. But all the facts we have on your coin are based on relatively small and undetailed images, and aside the size of the MM there&#039;s nothing else I can base concrete opinions on.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in