Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;desertgem, post: 1990571, member: 15199&quot;]The VAM 4 is a doubled die, so it wasn&#039;t a change made on purpose. Most of the VAM were not, it just didn&#039;t matter much to many collectors&nbsp; where the CC mintmark was micro-located or angled, as long as it was in the &#039;normal area&#039;. Also many repair jobs on dies produced VAMs and if the repaired die failed quickly, it may have been a long time before it was noticed. In the early days of collecting, even the difference between a CC and S wasn&#039;t considered other than normal, collecting by mintmarks would come later.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in