Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Valentinian, post: 4017383, member: 44316&quot;]An interesting thought. Some Valentinian III AE4 issues have officina P, S, T, Q, E. There are siliquae of Trier with clear TRPS, so Trier was a mint at the time. But the photos in RIC X of Valentinian&#039;s numerous AE4 types, presumably of the best examples available, rarely show a clear mintmark, even if the text gives a mintmark. If we could find any AE4 with a &quot;PR&quot; mintmark I could argue mine was &quot;SR&quot; (Secunda Roma) and the R4 &quot;TR&quot; mintmark supposedly of Trier (RIC X 2165-6, one illustrated, but that coin has the mintmark, if any, entirely off the flan) might refer to <b>T</b>ertia <b>R</b>oma.</p><p><br /></p><p>There is a lot we don&#039;t know for sure about 5th C. AE4&#039;s.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in