Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;onDvine, post: 36376, member: 2195&quot;]I didn&#039;t expect anything different, BUT I knew if I didn&#039;t ask for confirmation, it meant I hadn&#039;t learned a lesson that I actually have.&nbsp; The mark could&#039;ve been the unique &quot;signature&quot; of some mint tool or glitch I&#039;m not aware of, nevermind familiar with.&nbsp; Thanks for taking the time to look. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><br /></p><p>If I&#039;m sure of something in a field about which I know very little...that&#039;s no basis for decision!&nbsp; The two I thought had the least chance of being damaged in mints were the clipped ones (or are they called clips?)...and the ugly one is more interesting to my eye than the undamaged one.&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>I REALLY enjoy the top two pennies from the same picture those were in.&nbsp; Those coins were each bent to the point of being concave/convex and have interesting markings, yet &quot;retained their integrity.&quot;&nbsp; That&#039;s how I think of the lack of breakage in their surfaces...no pits despite all that distortion.</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />&nbsp; I can still magnify the heck out of them in new scans (now that I&#039;ve played with the settings on the scanner more) and look just for fun![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in