Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BUncirculated, post: 1449277, member: 29581&quot;]I understand the process. CAC wants collectors to have full confidence in the grade opinion of the TPGs, and will &quot;bean&quot; the holder with either a green or gold sticker, both of which have different meanings. </p><p><br /></p><p>However, if CAC is using THEIR own standards of grading, that means we now have 4 different standards of grading.</p><p><br /></p><p>ANA</p><p><br /></p><p>PCGS</p><p><br /></p><p>NGC</p><p><br /></p><p>CAC.</p><p><br /></p><p>This has been my point right along on this thread, and the NGC PCGS Poll thread, that there is no consistent uniform set of standards being used, and followed by any of those services I listed, and as such, IMO, creates confusion in the hobby. </p><p><br /></p><p>I would believe that more collectors, who collect Franklin halves, and wish to submit the uncirculated specimens to a TPG for grading, attribution, designation, and slabbing; and also are hoping for the FBL designation on the label, would tend to lean more towards PCGS because they only look at the bottom set of lines on the bell, wherein NGC looks at both sets of lines. </p><p><br /></p><p>If we don&#039;t have uniformity, and consistency, in the hobby, as it relates to grading, the confusion will continue.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in