Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;imrich, post: 1446204, member: 22331&quot;]<b>Reading A Simple Post.</b></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><b>I tried to keep my recent post simple for like-minded individuals who may have problems with details/comprehension, as cited after a recent post.</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>I find your assumption of: &quot;</b>that nobody here has ever collected premium gem SLQ&#039;s<b>&quot;, and statements: &quot;</b>Lastly, not one person mentioned luster<b>&quot;, &quot;</b>predisposed hatred towards TPG&#039;s and CAC.<b>&quot;, &quot;</b>just my humble, very informed, opinion<b>&quot;,&nbsp; to probably be evidence that assumptive, comprehensive, absolutes, and ego-centric criticism by others may be warranted. I believe the criticism is supported by your aforementioned statements.</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b></b><b>&quot;</b>that nobody here has ever collected premium gem SLQ&#039;s<b>&quot;? </b><b>I haven&#039;t been privy to your collection/understanding of &quot;premium gem SLQ&#039;s&quot;, but based on arguments/hyperbole, I suspect that mine, and others may be comparable. </b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b></b><b>&quot;</b>Lastly, not one person mentioned luster<b>&quot;?</b><b> Not only did I mention Luster, I cited the A.N.A. technical published standard for a lower grade, and reference date of publication: &quot;</b><b>(1977 A.N.A. MS65 Tech. Spec. &quot;Has full mint luster&quot;)&quot;</b><b> </b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>&quot;</b>predisposed hatred towards TPG&#039;s and CAC.<b>&quot;? As previously stated, I&#039;m not privy to your personal statistics, but suspect that the certified majority of my 7 figure collection doesn&#039;t constitute&nbsp; a &quot;predisposed hatred&quot;. I argue that facts support: merely a concern for unfaultering inferred unexcelled performance in profession, as I would/do? provide.</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b> &quot;</b>humble, very informed<b>&quot;?</b> <b>oxymoronic?, or moronic?</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>Thanks for any objective, enlightening, and informed correction.</b><b></b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>Let&#039;s try to present facts, and avoid possibly slanderous (i.e. </b><b>unqualitative or unquantitative) non-</b><b>supported statements. </b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b></b>:bow:[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in