Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Useless CAC sticker
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Morgandude11, post: 1446188, member: 37839"]I agree that the toning is attractive, and that it is a premium coin. I don't collect that series at all, so my grading of it would be suspect at best. First impressions for me was that it was a strong 65 as opposed to a 66, but as I said, I don't collect them, so grading a coin I have little to do with is not that precise. It clearly is a premium coin, and I find the eye appeal quite attractive. CAC designations do mean something to me.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Morgandude11, post: 1446188, member: 37839"]I agree that the toning is attractive, and that it is a premium coin. I don't collect that series at all, so my grading of it would be suspect at best. First impressions for me was that it was a strong 65 as opposed to a 66, but as I said, I don't collect them, so grading a coin I have little to do with is not that precise. It clearly is a premium coin, and I find the eye appeal quite attractive. CAC designations do mean something to me.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Useless CAC sticker
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...