Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GoldFinger1969, post: 6201671, member: 73489&quot;]I think I remember something like that when I was scanning the relevant thread(s) a few years ago.</p><p><br /></p><p>Someone there posted that prior to the aborted (?) 1st trial that Mint attorneys contacted friends of someone at CU asking for what the testimony would be and/or looking for dirt.</p><p><br /></p><p>Shows you that just like the Import/Export Letter on the Farouk Coin and the March 7th, 1933 Mint directive on Coin Exchanges (that their so-called expert called an &quot;orphan document&quot; because he got burned on its existence and didn&#039;t know didley)....<b>they feared more surprises.</b></p><p><br /></p><p>Without that moronic, dimwitted judge, they never would have won if there was a fair trial. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie4" alt=":mad:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in