Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
US Mint and Banks
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="cladking, post: 132422, member: 68"]There is a lot of variability in quality from mint to mint, year to year and between the different denominations. 1966 quarters were typically very poorly struck from poorly made and heavily worn dies but it wasn't overly difficult to find these pretty clean. 1974 dollars often looked to be VF right out of the bag. 1998 cents were often pristine gems and MS-65 was nearly typical. In more recent times there has been a great increase in strike quality because of improved die steels and lower relief but these are often scratched up very badly. The Delaware Philly quarter was one of those that was almost impossible to find clean. I never did see one that would grade over MS-61 and I did watch pretty closely. </p><p><br /></p><p>Another thing to consider is that a roll or even a jumbo bag is in no way a representative sample of a coin. The output of only a few presses will fill these rolls and bags so you'll see just a few minute cross section of what was being produced by only a few dies. A typical roll will usually contain five to ten die pairs and each die pair will be over a short period of their production. Even in years that quality is horrendous it's possible to get a roll of all gems (merely unlikely). It is this tendency for gems and varieties to "bunch up" that makes them so difficult to find but when you do find them there may be thousands in the area. </p><p><br /></p><p>There was almost no interest in circulating coinage until the last few years. As proof consider the '82-P quarter. Everyone knew that there would be no mint sets made that year so more rolls of these were set aside than any of the other eagle reverse clad quarters. Despite this heavy saving this roll still sells for a couple hundred dollars since there are no mint sets to cannibilize for the coin. </p><p><br /></p><p>While the bicentennial quarter was horded in large numbers and the average quality was good, the gems are nearly as scarce for this coin as the others of the era. This gives some insight into how difficult gems of some of these are. Little has really changed in recent years except that now it's largely marking keeping coins out of gem status rather than strike and marking.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="cladking, post: 132422, member: 68"]There is a lot of variability in quality from mint to mint, year to year and between the different denominations. 1966 quarters were typically very poorly struck from poorly made and heavily worn dies but it wasn't overly difficult to find these pretty clean. 1974 dollars often looked to be VF right out of the bag. 1998 cents were often pristine gems and MS-65 was nearly typical. In more recent times there has been a great increase in strike quality because of improved die steels and lower relief but these are often scratched up very badly. The Delaware Philly quarter was one of those that was almost impossible to find clean. I never did see one that would grade over MS-61 and I did watch pretty closely. Another thing to consider is that a roll or even a jumbo bag is in no way a representative sample of a coin. The output of only a few presses will fill these rolls and bags so you'll see just a few minute cross section of what was being produced by only a few dies. A typical roll will usually contain five to ten die pairs and each die pair will be over a short period of their production. Even in years that quality is horrendous it's possible to get a roll of all gems (merely unlikely). It is this tendency for gems and varieties to "bunch up" that makes them so difficult to find but when you do find them there may be thousands in the area. There was almost no interest in circulating coinage until the last few years. As proof consider the '82-P quarter. Everyone knew that there would be no mint sets made that year so more rolls of these were set aside than any of the other eagle reverse clad quarters. Despite this heavy saving this roll still sells for a couple hundred dollars since there are no mint sets to cannibilize for the coin. While the bicentennial quarter was horded in large numbers and the average quality was good, the gems are nearly as scarce for this coin as the others of the era. This gives some insight into how difficult gems of some of these are. Little has really changed in recent years except that now it's largely marking keeping coins out of gem status rather than strike and marking.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
US Mint and Banks
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...