Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;nerarities, post: 1046827, member: 26684&quot;]Hi CheetahCats,</p><p><br /></p><p>I do believe the 56-n was misattributed in both sales.&nbsp; Bill Anton viewed the coin in the Bareford sale and confirmed that it was not a Georgius Triumpho undertype.&nbsp; I have not seen the coin in person myself though.&nbsp; The 73-aa that Breen mentions overstruck (as well as other NJ varieties) on Triumphos were all viewed by Mike Hodder and Mike Ringo over the years and they were found to be over Irish counterfeits with similar letter punches.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>The 73-aa confirmed with the Triumpho undertype is fairly low grade with surface porosity.&nbsp; In general this does not seem like the kind of coin that Boyd would have bought condition wise.&nbsp; It also would have shown up in one of the Boyd/Ford duplicate sales or the Ford sales themselves.&nbsp; It really is a cool coin!![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in