Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GoldFinger1969, post: 3859406, member: 73489&quot;]It appears to be a super-large (3000 !) number of coins, pretty much the entire universe except maybe coins like a one-of-a-kind Draped Bust or a 1927-D or 1933 Saint:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/my-analysis-of-the-pcgs-3000-index.324748/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/my-analysis-of-the-pcgs-3000-index.324748/">https://www.cointalk.com/threads/my-analysis-of-the-pcgs-3000-index.324748/</a></p><p><br /></p><p><b><span style="color: #b30000">PCGS or NGC should create an index for the most LIQUID coins or the ones colletors show the most interest in.&nbsp; </span></b></p><p><br /></p><ul> <li>It should be maybe 20-50 names</li> <li>It should have a bunch of generic/common coins and not the super-rarities.&nbsp; You can include somewhat more expensive years/mints/types but it shouldn&#039;t be something 20x or 50x as expensive. </li> <li>The commons should include Saints (i.e., 1924, 1927, 1923-D) and Morgans in 2 or 3 grades, not just 1 grade.</li> <li>AU-58 (highest non-mint state) is a good grade to include.&nbsp; MS-63 is OK but MS-65 is probably better and MS-66 pricing sometimes separates and should be included.&nbsp; If the condition rarity is extreme in MS, go down to MS-63 or AU-58 for inclusion.</li> </ul><p><b><u>An index should be representative, simple to update daily/weekly/monthly (3000 coins is NOT easy to track !! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie4" alt=":mad:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />), have liquid names, and be among the popular names in the field. </u></b> </p><p><br /></p><p>This is why the DJIA is still the go-to index for many stock investors instead of the S&amp;P 500 or the Russell 2000.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in