Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Urbs Roma/Constantinopolis/2 Soldiers Hybrids
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="gsimonel, post: 2827687, member: 82549"]This is in response to a question I had regarding a thread started by Dave@PCC called "A Commemorative Journey." It concerns two coins of his that he shared in that thread:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]665703[/ATTACH] </p><p>Commemorative Series</p><p>Mint Constantinople</p><p>336/337 AD</p><p>Obvs: VRBS ROMA, Helmeted and mantled bust of Roma left.</p><p>Revs: Two soldiers standing facing one another, each holding reversed spear and resting hand upon shield. Between, signum surmounted by banner with annulet. CONSϵ</p><p>AE 15x16mm, 1.44g</p><p>Ref: RIC VII.143</p><p><br /></p><p>and </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]665702[/ATTACH] </p><p>Mint Constantinople</p><p>336/337 AD</p><p>Obvs: CONSTANTINOPOLI, Laureate and helmeted bust left, wearing imperial mantle, holding reversed spear.</p><p>Revs: Two soldiers standing facing one another, each holding reversed spear and resting hand upon shield. Between, signum surmounted by banner with annulet. CONSZ</p><p>AE 13x15mm, 127g</p><p>Ref: RIC VII.144</p><p>ex Warren Esty</p><p><br /></p><p>Here's the question that I posed:</p><p>At one time it was proposed that these were minted during the interregnum, the period following the death of Constantine but before his sons had a chance to initiate the murders of Decentius and Hannibalianus. Is that hypothesis still credible, or has it been rejected?</p><p><br /></p><p>Dave wrote: "CNG and others use a generic 330 to 354 date for these."</p><p><br /></p><p>The sons of Constantine waited, I think, about 3 months before declaring themselves co-Augusti. (This was to give themselves time to eliminate any potential rival claimants.) During this time (337 C.E.) there was no Augustus whose portrait belonged on the obverse, so it seems reasonable that many of these--what, hybrids?--were minted during this time. It's possible that these coins continued to be minted after the brothers claimed the purple, but I don't know how they came up with 354. Anyone know?</p><p><br /></p><p>The other question is how they came up with 330 as a beginning date, 7 years before the death of Constantine. Is there any hoard or other data to support this? Are there 2-standards versions of these? I've never seen any.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="gsimonel, post: 2827687, member: 82549"]This is in response to a question I had regarding a thread started by Dave@PCC called "A Commemorative Journey." It concerns two coins of his that he shared in that thread: [ATTACH=full]665703[/ATTACH] Commemorative Series Mint Constantinople 336/337 AD Obvs: VRBS ROMA, Helmeted and mantled bust of Roma left. Revs: Two soldiers standing facing one another, each holding reversed spear and resting hand upon shield. Between, signum surmounted by banner with annulet. CONSϵ AE 15x16mm, 1.44g Ref: RIC VII.143 and [ATTACH=full]665702[/ATTACH] Mint Constantinople 336/337 AD Obvs: CONSTANTINOPOLI, Laureate and helmeted bust left, wearing imperial mantle, holding reversed spear. Revs: Two soldiers standing facing one another, each holding reversed spear and resting hand upon shield. Between, signum surmounted by banner with annulet. CONSZ AE 13x15mm, 127g Ref: RIC VII.144 ex Warren Esty Here's the question that I posed: At one time it was proposed that these were minted during the interregnum, the period following the death of Constantine but before his sons had a chance to initiate the murders of Decentius and Hannibalianus. Is that hypothesis still credible, or has it been rejected? Dave wrote: "CNG and others use a generic 330 to 354 date for these." The sons of Constantine waited, I think, about 3 months before declaring themselves co-Augusti. (This was to give themselves time to eliminate any potential rival claimants.) During this time (337 C.E.) there was no Augustus whose portrait belonged on the obverse, so it seems reasonable that many of these--what, hybrids?--were minted during this time. It's possible that these coins continued to be minted after the brothers claimed the purple, but I don't know how they came up with 354. Anyone know? The other question is how they came up with 330 as a beginning date, 7 years before the death of Constantine. Is there any hoard or other data to support this? Are there 2-standards versions of these? I've never seen any.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Urbs Roma/Constantinopolis/2 Soldiers Hybrids
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...