Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Upgrading does not always mean you can sell the old one
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1391513, member: 19463"]With ancient coins there are just too many things to consider when deciding if a coin belongs in our collections. I have always been bothered by rough coins and hate broken coins but there was something I liked about my Magnentius so I kept it hoping someday to upgrade to a whole coin without a chunk missing. </p><p>[ATTACH]166166.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>This week I was able to add a similar coin that I found quite attractive but now can't accept it as the upgrade of my dreams because, for all its good points, the old coin still has some virtues over the new:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]166167.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>The new coin has nice surfaces and is fully round but it does have more wear and less detail on the reverse scene. The old coin has a very unusual horse head that really looks like a cat while the new one is considerably more equine. The new coin is certainly identifiable as an RIC 271 page 158 but the old one is cutting it close in the area after the mintmark making it hard to call whether it is a 269, 270 or 271 (a range from R2 to C2 for those who believe in RIC rarity scales). There is also a difference in the officina with the old being a TRP while the new is TRS. </p><p><br /></p><p>It turns out that my desire to replace a faulty coin failed because the new coin, while perfect in some ways, falls short when it comes to detail and the saddled cat remains cute enough to keep a place in my collection. Most collectors probably would never have bought the broken coin in the first place but now I find myself unwilling to part with it until I find a whole cat-faced coin with good detail and good surfaces. This is an example of how a collector who accepts coins for their good points while overlooking their shortcomings can end up with way too many coins and still be convince that all are different and needed. </p><p><br /></p><p>I admit wondering if anyone else has a coin of this type that would confirm the RIC listing of the broken coin (TRP plain, dot or crescent?) and if anyone else has a cat faced horse?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1391513, member: 19463"]With ancient coins there are just too many things to consider when deciding if a coin belongs in our collections. I have always been bothered by rough coins and hate broken coins but there was something I liked about my Magnentius so I kept it hoping someday to upgrade to a whole coin without a chunk missing. [ATTACH]166166.vB[/ATTACH] This week I was able to add a similar coin that I found quite attractive but now can't accept it as the upgrade of my dreams because, for all its good points, the old coin still has some virtues over the new: [ATTACH]166167.vB[/ATTACH] The new coin has nice surfaces and is fully round but it does have more wear and less detail on the reverse scene. The old coin has a very unusual horse head that really looks like a cat while the new one is considerably more equine. The new coin is certainly identifiable as an RIC 271 page 158 but the old one is cutting it close in the area after the mintmark making it hard to call whether it is a 269, 270 or 271 (a range from R2 to C2 for those who believe in RIC rarity scales). There is also a difference in the officina with the old being a TRP while the new is TRS. It turns out that my desire to replace a faulty coin failed because the new coin, while perfect in some ways, falls short when it comes to detail and the saddled cat remains cute enough to keep a place in my collection. Most collectors probably would never have bought the broken coin in the first place but now I find myself unwilling to part with it until I find a whole cat-faced coin with good detail and good surfaces. This is an example of how a collector who accepts coins for their good points while overlooking their shortcomings can end up with way too many coins and still be convince that all are different and needed. I admit wondering if anyone else has a coin of this type that would confirm the RIC listing of the broken coin (TRP plain, dot or crescent?) and if anyone else has a cat faced horse?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Upgrading does not always mean you can sell the old one
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...