Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;krispy, post: 678954, member: 19065&quot;]Thanks for the comments yakpoo. I do follow your input throughout the threads since first encountering you and respect your opinions and jests. You see, it&#039;s &#039;quality over quantity&#039; that warms my heart and why I disagree with the number of posts you reference for validity to your argument regarding this thread. elaine <u>isn&#039;t</u> doing anything wrong and I never stated as much, despite my suggesting better record keeping, attention to detail and referencing of data culled from other readily available and accurately published sources. Indeed, I&#039;ve even praised the continuity with which elaine proceeds with these posts and shared brief conversations from time to time with elaine through these threads. I have nothing against the member nor wish to take over the members work here as you seem to imply I might (like to) do. I do encourage a discourse and ask questions when/where necessary in this and other threads. These comments have been my observation and concern, where few other members have voiced as much, yet I have been promptly admonished for doing so, I am not deterred. Addressing the inaccuracies in elaines figures, asking questions or offering links where others might benefit from the more complete set of data for comparison may be my greatest offering to these threads, but standing up to the objections of members doubting my intention to question the figures or understand the publishing of the figures is also a necessary task of questioning the data as presented in such un-cited fashion in the first place.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in