Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 2285459, member: 19463&quot;]RIC 95 page 593 is a good match but for Maximinus II with other dot placements given for Licinius so it is quite possibly something previously overlooked.&nbsp; My CMH is only 5.4g but has no dot so RIC 85 page 592.&nbsp; RIC gives the break for 85 as A-V but AV-G as on both our coins for 95.&nbsp; Perhaps this coin fell in the middle of the change.</p><p><br /></p><p>The question we all have to ask is whether a dot interests us or not.&nbsp; A Licinius specialist might love to see the coin.&nbsp; I certainly buy it as a nice coin but I would not pay extra for the dot.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]457469[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in