Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Unpublished/Mule/Counterfeit Eugenius Bronze
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="artemisnumismatics, post: 4364381, member: 112035"]Howdy all,</p><p><br /></p><p>Recently, I acquired this Eugenius example that has been giving me quite a run for my money.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1103192[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1103190[/ATTACH] </p><p>So far, I've only been able to determine that the coin depicts Eugenius and is of the Lugdunum (Lyons) mint. It measures roughly 16-17mm in diameter, and it appears to be bronze. Unfortunately, I do not have a scale accurate enough to determine its weight. Beyond this, I've hit a wall at its actual attribution. It does not match any published Eugenius issue that I could find, and it appears to most similar to RIC IX 46:</p><p>Eugenius Siliqua. Lyons. 392-395 AD. DN EVGENI-VS PF AVG, bearded, pearl-diademed, draped and cuirassed bust right / VRBS-ROMA, Roma, seated left on cuirass, holding Victory on globe and inverted spear with barb. Mintmark LVGPS. RIC IX 46; RSC 18A; Sear 20687.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1103193[/ATTACH] </p><p>Obviously, the issue with this is that my coin is bronze (as far as I know), which leads me to a few possible conclusions.</p><p><br /></p><p>a) The coin is a very low purity siliqua, perhaps a bad batch from Lugdunum. This would make sense since the coin fits the diameter (~15mm) and design of a Eugenius siliqua.</p><p><br /></p><p>b) The coin is an unpublished bronze variety, which seems very unlikely but is still possible.</p><p><br /></p><p>c) The coin is a bronze mule, perhaps accidentally matched with the reverse die of a siliqua or with a Valentinian bronze of the same era:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1103194[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>d) The coin is an ancient imitation or fouree, either a crudely made bronze counterfeit or a fouree who's silver coating has long since worn away.</p><p><br /></p><p>e) The coin is a modern counterfeit. While possible, I think this is unlikely as a counterfeiter would either mint/cast with silver for a siliqua, and it wouldn't make sense to create a counterfeit of a bronze coin which does not exist.</p><p><br /></p><p>In all honesty, I am dead stuck on this one, so any and all input is appreciated! Thank you![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="artemisnumismatics, post: 4364381, member: 112035"]Howdy all, Recently, I acquired this Eugenius example that has been giving me quite a run for my money. [ATTACH=full]1103192[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1103190[/ATTACH] So far, I've only been able to determine that the coin depicts Eugenius and is of the Lugdunum (Lyons) mint. It measures roughly 16-17mm in diameter, and it appears to be bronze. Unfortunately, I do not have a scale accurate enough to determine its weight. Beyond this, I've hit a wall at its actual attribution. It does not match any published Eugenius issue that I could find, and it appears to most similar to RIC IX 46: Eugenius Siliqua. Lyons. 392-395 AD. DN EVGENI-VS PF AVG, bearded, pearl-diademed, draped and cuirassed bust right / VRBS-ROMA, Roma, seated left on cuirass, holding Victory on globe and inverted spear with barb. Mintmark LVGPS. RIC IX 46; RSC 18A; Sear 20687. [ATTACH=full]1103193[/ATTACH] Obviously, the issue with this is that my coin is bronze (as far as I know), which leads me to a few possible conclusions. a) The coin is a very low purity siliqua, perhaps a bad batch from Lugdunum. This would make sense since the coin fits the diameter (~15mm) and design of a Eugenius siliqua. b) The coin is an unpublished bronze variety, which seems very unlikely but is still possible. c) The coin is a bronze mule, perhaps accidentally matched with the reverse die of a siliqua or with a Valentinian bronze of the same era: [ATTACH=full]1103194[/ATTACH] d) The coin is an ancient imitation or fouree, either a crudely made bronze counterfeit or a fouree who's silver coating has long since worn away. e) The coin is a modern counterfeit. While possible, I think this is unlikely as a counterfeiter would either mint/cast with silver for a siliqua, and it wouldn't make sense to create a counterfeit of a bronze coin which does not exist. In all honesty, I am dead stuck on this one, so any and all input is appreciated! Thank you![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Unpublished/Mule/Counterfeit Eugenius Bronze
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...