Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Jack D. Young, post: 3992179, member: 93371&quot;]OK, the answers!</p><p><br /></p><p>My OP example was graded VF Details- damaged. There were many who also saw it that way.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1051145[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>As far as authenticity, not so much; not only do the main sister marks match the probable source example but also match my 2nd one in the collection.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1051146[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>This raw example was worked on and “weathered” to make it look different but the main attribution points are still visible.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1051147[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>So another counterfeit good enough to be considered “genuine”…</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1051148[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Interest in this post was significantly down from the previous ones and may well be the last for the series- thanks to those who did participate![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in