Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Unknown Barbarian Tremissis of Leo
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Tejas, post: 7828992, member: 84905"]I think the coin I posted was from Wildwinds (need to find it again). But here is a very similar piece from the University of Münster in Germany. They also attribute it - correctly as I think - to the official mint of Rome (you have to scroll down a bit)</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.uni-muenster.de/Numismatik/muenzedesmonats/mdm2018.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.uni-muenster.de/Numismatik/muenzedesmonats/mdm2018.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.uni-muenster.de/Numismatik/muenzedesmonats/mdm2018.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1345013[/ATTACH] </p><p>Flavius Procopius Anthemius (um 420–472 n. Chr.) | Gold, Solidus, 4,42 g, 22 mm, <b>Münzstätte Rom,</b> 467–472 n. Chr. | Av.: D N ANTHEMI-VS P F AVG, Panzerbüste des Anthemius mit Helm, Schild und Speer | Rv.: SALVS REI P-V-BLICAE / COMOB. Kaiser Anthemius und Kaiser Leo I. in Rüstung und Mantel, einander die Hand reichend; darüber Schild mit PAX; im Feld links R, im Feld rechts M | RIC X Anthemius 2804 | Münzkabinett | Berlin, Objektnummer 18201533</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Found it. Yes the coin is on Wildwinds:</p><p><a href="http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/ric/anthemius/t.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/ric/anthemius/t.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/ric/anthemius/t.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>just as several other highly "barbaric" solidi of Anthemius, which are attributed to official mints like Rome, Ravenna and Milan.</p><p><br /></p><p>Again, there were no barbarians, Germanic or otherwise, around at the time to whom these coins could be attributed. Instead, I think what happened is that control over the official mints deteriorated. They probably lacked resources (craftsmen, artists, perhaps tools) to produce high-standard coins and could only produce coins of "barbaric" style.</p><p><br /></p><p>Indeed, this is also what happened later in the Germanic kingdoms. While the style of Ostrogothic coins remained superior even to that of their pendants from Constantinople, Visigothic and Frankish coins deteriorated. This is not because these people wished to express their native style or their barbarism on coins, but simply because they lacked the resources to produce better coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>There are very rare exceptions to this. The solidus below was found in Germany north of the Limes. The coin does reflect something that is genuinely Germanic, i.e. linked to Germanic art and style that is clearly not just imitating Roman style (the coin is a dream):</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1345012[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Tejas, post: 7828992, member: 84905"]I think the coin I posted was from Wildwinds (need to find it again). But here is a very similar piece from the University of Münster in Germany. They also attribute it - correctly as I think - to the official mint of Rome (you have to scroll down a bit) [URL]https://www.uni-muenster.de/Numismatik/muenzedesmonats/mdm2018.html[/URL] [ATTACH=full]1345013[/ATTACH] Flavius Procopius Anthemius (um 420–472 n. Chr.) | Gold, Solidus, 4,42 g, 22 mm, [B]Münzstätte Rom,[/B] 467–472 n. Chr. | Av.: D N ANTHEMI-VS P F AVG, Panzerbüste des Anthemius mit Helm, Schild und Speer | Rv.: SALVS REI P-V-BLICAE / COMOB. Kaiser Anthemius und Kaiser Leo I. in Rüstung und Mantel, einander die Hand reichend; darüber Schild mit PAX; im Feld links R, im Feld rechts M | RIC X Anthemius 2804 | Münzkabinett | Berlin, Objektnummer 18201533 Found it. Yes the coin is on Wildwinds: [URL]http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/ric/anthemius/t.html[/URL] just as several other highly "barbaric" solidi of Anthemius, which are attributed to official mints like Rome, Ravenna and Milan. Again, there were no barbarians, Germanic or otherwise, around at the time to whom these coins could be attributed. Instead, I think what happened is that control over the official mints deteriorated. They probably lacked resources (craftsmen, artists, perhaps tools) to produce high-standard coins and could only produce coins of "barbaric" style. Indeed, this is also what happened later in the Germanic kingdoms. While the style of Ostrogothic coins remained superior even to that of their pendants from Constantinople, Visigothic and Frankish coins deteriorated. This is not because these people wished to express their native style or their barbarism on coins, but simply because they lacked the resources to produce better coins. There are very rare exceptions to this. The solidus below was found in Germany north of the Limes. The coin does reflect something that is genuinely Germanic, i.e. linked to Germanic art and style that is clearly not just imitating Roman style (the coin is a dream): [ATTACH=full]1345012[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Unknown Barbarian Tremissis of Leo
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...