Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Unique Evolution in Alexandrian Tets During the Transition Into the Tetrarchy
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3630657, member: 19463"]Let's remember That all three of these are the same years. Earlier, the practice was for a junior ruler to begin his dates with the then current number of the senior Augustus. Therefore, LIH of Septimius Severus and Caracalla were the same year even though Caracalla's coins did not start for several years after his father's. Diocletian broke with this system and started Maximianus with LA even though Diocletian was LB so there always is a one year setback between the two. The Caesars did not start until long after Diocletian and Maximianus but they started with one.</p><p><br /></p><p>I only have one Diocletian A year 9 to show. We need to remember that there are many coins on small flans or off center which lost the exergue number if there was one. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]973773[/ATTACH] </p><p>This Maximianus year 9 shows nothing between the ground line and the outer border. It would seem it should have a B. Does this mean the practice was stopped in that year??? Does anyone have a Diocletian year ten with a clear exergue with or without the A? Who has a year 11 or 12 to show? Emmett lists them but I have none. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]973774[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3630657, member: 19463"]Let's remember That all three of these are the same years. Earlier, the practice was for a junior ruler to begin his dates with the then current number of the senior Augustus. Therefore, LIH of Septimius Severus and Caracalla were the same year even though Caracalla's coins did not start for several years after his father's. Diocletian broke with this system and started Maximianus with LA even though Diocletian was LB so there always is a one year setback between the two. The Caesars did not start until long after Diocletian and Maximianus but they started with one. I only have one Diocletian A year 9 to show. We need to remember that there are many coins on small flans or off center which lost the exergue number if there was one. [ATTACH=full]973773[/ATTACH] This Maximianus year 9 shows nothing between the ground line and the outer border. It would seem it should have a B. Does this mean the practice was stopped in that year??? Does anyone have a Diocletian year ten with a clear exergue with or without the A? Who has a year 11 or 12 to show? Emmett lists them but I have none. [ATTACH=full]973774[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Unique Evolution in Alexandrian Tets During the Transition Into the Tetrarchy
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...