Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Uncirculated mint sets vs. circulating coins
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="cladking, post: 357576, member: 68"]I believe you're right about dies being chrome plated. They have said proof dies are chrome plated to make the cameo effect last longer. It's likely they've done some other sort of die prep to make the satin finish. I've started looking at these coins only recently and they are not so dramatically different from some older mint set coins. And some appear to be nearly identical to the older mint set coins which really means they are identical to the best made of the circulation issues as well. </p><p><br /></p><p>Perhaps there will be more information forthcoming but to my knowledge this is all they have said to date. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I've long suspected the earlier mint set coins (pre-65) were pulled out of circulation runs. The same applies to the '71 to '98 souvenir set coins. It appears they just went out on the floor and selected nice examples. </p><p><br /></p><p>In 1965 the mint and government were trying to punish collectors because they were percieved as responsible for the coin shortage. Initially there were to be no mint or proof sets offered after '64. San Francisco was pressed into service to help alleviate the coin shortage and the numismatic equipment was shipped there. When the SMS's were finally put into production it was apparently done with the old proof set equipment and it appears they continued with many of these changes even after the true mint set was resumed in 1968. In any case when mint set production resumed in 1968 the coins had much more in common with the SMS coins than they did with the pre-'65 mint sets. The dies didn't recieve the proof treatment like the SMS's but they were otherwise the same. There are some very PL examples of most dates in these sets after '64. Indeed, some of the post-'86 coins look very much like branch mint proofs. There are '91-D quarters which are fully struck, virtually flawless, extremely lustrous, and having fully square rims. '88-D cents are nearly common like this (~.5%). Some of the Philly's from the late '70's are also highly PL.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="cladking, post: 357576, member: 68"]I believe you're right about dies being chrome plated. They have said proof dies are chrome plated to make the cameo effect last longer. It's likely they've done some other sort of die prep to make the satin finish. I've started looking at these coins only recently and they are not so dramatically different from some older mint set coins. And some appear to be nearly identical to the older mint set coins which really means they are identical to the best made of the circulation issues as well. Perhaps there will be more information forthcoming but to my knowledge this is all they have said to date. I've long suspected the earlier mint set coins (pre-65) were pulled out of circulation runs. The same applies to the '71 to '98 souvenir set coins. It appears they just went out on the floor and selected nice examples. In 1965 the mint and government were trying to punish collectors because they were percieved as responsible for the coin shortage. Initially there were to be no mint or proof sets offered after '64. San Francisco was pressed into service to help alleviate the coin shortage and the numismatic equipment was shipped there. When the SMS's were finally put into production it was apparently done with the old proof set equipment and it appears they continued with many of these changes even after the true mint set was resumed in 1968. In any case when mint set production resumed in 1968 the coins had much more in common with the SMS coins than they did with the pre-'65 mint sets. The dies didn't recieve the proof treatment like the SMS's but they were otherwise the same. There are some very PL examples of most dates in these sets after '64. Indeed, some of the post-'86 coins look very much like branch mint proofs. There are '91-D quarters which are fully struck, virtually flawless, extremely lustrous, and having fully square rims. '88-D cents are nearly common like this (~.5%). Some of the Philly's from the late '70's are also highly PL.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Uncirculated mint sets vs. circulating coins
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...