Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;seth77, post: 2278459, member: 56653&quot;]I agree.</p><p>Were these errors? Can we say for sure that there was a rule that stated 3rd officina at Alexandria around 385 should mint only for Theodosius and not for Valentinian? We&#039;re doing puzzles here and I think it&#039;s most likely that the scarcity today of some types for some rulers by some officinae is simply the result of hazard.</p><p>On the other hand we just proved that 3rd officina at Alexandria between 383 and 388 minted for Val II too. Next time someone is interested in finding analogies for his unlisted Val II has this post to rely on. And he can add to his notes, like I do, &quot;unlisted in RIC but not unknown as recorded by X on cointalk&quot;.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in