Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Unassuming Valentinian II rarity
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2278452, member: 19463"]The important thing to specialists is not so much finding something for $5 that is worth $6 but finding something that adds to what we know about what we study. A coin with a previously unlisted officina just says that on one day someone struck things a bit differently. We don't necessarily know why but sometimes we see or imagine some significance in a change in shop assignments. For example a rare officina could be an accident or a sign that the type was being struck when the word was received that a person on the obverse died or fell from favor. Coin people LOVE it when the coins contribute something to the knowledge of history. Little clues may come up a hundred times for every time we understand one but that is one more than we had before. I believe coin evidence has changed the year we believe Pescennius Niger died and is suggesting (to some, anyway) that Philip II may have lived longer than his father or that word of his death did not reach the East as rapidly as did word of his father's death. I don't have the proof on such things and warn that there is no absolute proof in any science.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2278452, member: 19463"]The important thing to specialists is not so much finding something for $5 that is worth $6 but finding something that adds to what we know about what we study. A coin with a previously unlisted officina just says that on one day someone struck things a bit differently. We don't necessarily know why but sometimes we see or imagine some significance in a change in shop assignments. For example a rare officina could be an accident or a sign that the type was being struck when the word was received that a person on the obverse died or fell from favor. Coin people LOVE it when the coins contribute something to the knowledge of history. Little clues may come up a hundred times for every time we understand one but that is one more than we had before. I believe coin evidence has changed the year we believe Pescennius Niger died and is suggesting (to some, anyway) that Philip II may have lived longer than his father or that word of his death did not reach the East as rapidly as did word of his father's death. I don't have the proof on such things and warn that there is no absolute proof in any science.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Unassuming Valentinian II rarity
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...