Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ugly, but still loved
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2255700, member: 19463"]I prefer not to collect ugly coins unless they have redeeming values including rarity that keep me from having a nicer example. Rather than typing a lot here, I'll post links to two of my pages that cover the question. In 1998, I posted a page showing coins I considered collectible even though they are ugly. Two of them are, to the best of my knowledge, unique and, therefore, the best known. Please show me photos if you see another of them.</p><p><a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/feac59ugl.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/feac59ugl.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/feac59ugl.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Of the bunch, I singled out one coin on the first link above as the most common coin on that page but I consider it ugly in a nice way. It was hammered through with an iron nail but still has good reverse detail of the popular comet type. Augustus, on the other hand, did not do so well. </p><p><img src="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/nailaug.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>This year, I posted my page on Wabi Sabi Ancients:</p><p><a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/wabisabi.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/wabisabi.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/wabisabi.html</a></p><p>Many are a bit ugly.</p><p><br /></p><p>I have shown all of these coins before but I hope some will follow the links to see the others.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2255700, member: 19463"]I prefer not to collect ugly coins unless they have redeeming values including rarity that keep me from having a nicer example. Rather than typing a lot here, I'll post links to two of my pages that cover the question. In 1998, I posted a page showing coins I considered collectible even though they are ugly. Two of them are, to the best of my knowledge, unique and, therefore, the best known. Please show me photos if you see another of them. [url]http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/feac59ugl.html[/url] Of the bunch, I singled out one coin on the first link above as the most common coin on that page but I consider it ugly in a nice way. It was hammered through with an iron nail but still has good reverse detail of the popular comet type. Augustus, on the other hand, did not do so well. [IMG]http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/nailaug.jpg[/IMG] This year, I posted my page on Wabi Sabi Ancients: [url]http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/wabisabi.html[/url] Many are a bit ugly. I have shown all of these coins before but I hope some will follow the links to see the others.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ugly, but still loved
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...