Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
ugly ancients
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="stevex6, post: 2021697, member: 44183"]<span style="color: #0000ff">Man, those are horrible lookin' coins fellas ... congrats!!</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">I have a few ... but as Doug mentioned, I seem to have them for a couple of reasons (ugly is usually "not" my intended fishin' hole)</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">My first fugly example was my 2nd overall ancient coin purchase "ever" ... Valentinian was my first ancient coin purchase, but for some reason I still kinda like the looks of my Valentinian example ...... ummm, but Claudius II (Gothicus) is a bit of a dog (however, it is also my least expensive coin, so I guess it all makes sense => it's fugly, because I was merely testing the ancient-waters at the time) ... </span></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: #ff0000"><b>Claudius II (Gothicus)</b></span></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]366244[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]366245[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">... I have another fairly fugly example, but this baby is ugly-combined-with cool, so it is kinda acceptable in my mind (ugly, but with a reason) ... </span></p><p><br /></p><p><b><span style="color: #ff0000"> Cilicia Ninica-Claudiopolis AE37 (with countermarks!!) </span></b></p><p><b><span style="color: #ff0000">Severus Alexander with Julia Maesa</span></b></p><p><b><span style="color: #ff0000"><br /></span></b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]366246[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">=> yup, good ol' countermarks</span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="stevex6, post: 2021697, member: 44183"][COLOR=#0000ff]Man, those are horrible lookin' coins fellas ... congrats!! ;) I have a few ... but as Doug mentioned, I seem to have them for a couple of reasons (ugly is usually "not" my intended fishin' hole) My first fugly example was my 2nd overall ancient coin purchase "ever" ... Valentinian was my first ancient coin purchase, but for some reason I still kinda like the looks of my Valentinian example ...... ummm, but Claudius II (Gothicus) is a bit of a dog (however, it is also my least expensive coin, so I guess it all makes sense => it's fugly, because I was merely testing the ancient-waters at the time) ... [/COLOR] [COLOR=#ff0000][B]Claudius II (Gothicus)[/B][/COLOR] [ATTACH=full]366244[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]366245[/ATTACH] [COLOR=#0000ff]... I have another fairly fugly example, but this baby is ugly-combined-with cool, so it is kinda acceptable in my mind (ugly, but with a reason) ... [/COLOR] [B][COLOR=#ff0000] Cilicia Ninica-Claudiopolis AE37 (with countermarks!!) Severus Alexander with Julia Maesa [/COLOR][/B] [ATTACH=full]366246[/ATTACH] [COLOR=#0000ff]=> yup, good ol' countermarks[/COLOR][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
ugly ancients
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...