Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BooksB4Coins, post: 2955423, member: 36230&quot;]And I could find this more convincing had you not mocked Reagan&#039;s appearance. All doing so has accomplished is to show your hypocritical approach in that it is apparently perfectly fine to go as far as to make jokes and laugh about a depiction of a man, but somehow wrong when it&#039;s a woman&#039;s depicted appearance in question.</p><p><br /></p><p>Did you happen to see the doughboy effigy posted earlier in this thread? The proportions are laughable and it looks as if he&#039;s wearing a mask to hide his deformed head, yet no one is voicing displeasure. Hmm... I wonder why?</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Oh, please... you know damned well that&#039;s not what I&#039;m saying; for Christ&#039;s sake stop virtue signaling.</p><p><br /></p><p>The OBVIOUS point was that everyone, no matter how attractive a person may generally be, doesn&#039;t always look so good. Simply take whatever famous person you personally find appealing and google less than flattering photos of them. Hell, think of yourself, Jeff; has every photo taken of you make you appear flattering? I&#039;m guessing not, and the same can be said for (as an example) Shriver. The chosen depiction is awful and saying as much isn&#039;t an insult to her person, or the example of misogyny so seem so desperate to suggest.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Predictable deflection. Your entire position is the same blatant political pandering everywhere today and couldn&#039;t be more obvious.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in