Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;johnmilton, post: 8475370, member: 101855&quot;]They probably didn’t miss it. The concept is PCGS graders probably didn’t think it was bad enough to rate a “details” grade. We can disagree with that. PCGS may have seen this as an MS-64 with an “L”. I saw the same thing with a 1798 Bust Dollar that had the sharpness of an AU with two letters lightly scratched into the right field. It was graded EF-45. </p><p><br /></p><p>My question is, why did CAC approve of that? Wasn’t CAC created to approve coins that were solid for the grade? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie10" alt=":oops:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in