Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;nerosmyfavorite68, post: 8251013, member: 134416&quot;]I enjoyed the article&#039;s snarky comment about the page&#039;s slow load times. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie84" alt=":smug:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie100" alt=":wideyed:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />.&nbsp; I guess that explains the contractor part <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie98" alt=":wacky:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie101" alt=":woot:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />.</p><p><br /></p><p>The collection looks to be superb, but it&#039;s so slow-loading, I&#039;ve only scraped the surface. He&#039;s got both Olybrius and Priscus Attalus, so it must be pretty good <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie59" alt=":joyful:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />.</p><p><br /></p><p>I do notice that quite a few usurpers &amp; the Gallic Empire (as well as Licinius) are missing.&nbsp; Given his deep pockets, this must be intentional.&nbsp; What&#039;s the criteria? I would say possession of Rome, but Julian of Pannonia never occupied Rome.</p><p><br /></p><p>It&#039;s certainly a collection to bow down before.&nbsp; Even with the 56k modem loading times, it was very nice of him to share the collection with the world.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in