Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Two new and troubling coins
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2415048, member: 19463"]My show today produced the usual group of coins that I like and some of you may but tonight I will only show the extremes. First is the most expensive coin I bought but I must have got a bargain because I easily found an online listing for this exact specimen selling in 2013 for over $100 more than I paid. This is the fourth time I have found a new coin of mine listed as having been sold by this particular dealer for more than I paid so I assume that his practice is to list unsold coins as having sold and then wholesaling them off to small dealers from whom I buy them. I see nothing wrong with the coin but I would not have bid on it in a sale where it was hyped as aEF (see the scratches - they showed in the 2013 photo, too). It is a nice example of the coin but why do we have to call everything EF? As far as listing coins that don't sell as sold so you can make it look like you are a hotshot dealer .... lets just say it does not make me want to deal with him.</p><p><br /></p><p>Eukratides , Baktria, 170-155 BC AE hemiobol Dioscuri riding</p><p>[ATTACH=full]499663[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Cheapest and worst today is a coin the seller could not ID but I could so I bought it cheap (or only slightly more than something this ugly is worth). Ordinarily I would tell you the ID but it is an Alexandrian tetradrachm so I will post it here and ask JA to practice using his new Emmett book to ID it. Sure it is missing some legend but it has all the letters needed to get the name right even if you don't have the book. I would appreciate anyone owning a nicer one to post it here for comparison. Others who like ID challenges are welcome to try this one, too, but I will be out most of tomorrow so I won't be available to answer questions. I know when I bought it that it was not worth anything in the market but sometimes you just enjoy throwing money to the wind. I wonder if it could be cleaned or tooled to look better??? If the rest of the coin was as nice as the portrait, this thing would be very desirable. As it is....????</p><p>[ATTACH=full]499671[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2415048, member: 19463"]My show today produced the usual group of coins that I like and some of you may but tonight I will only show the extremes. First is the most expensive coin I bought but I must have got a bargain because I easily found an online listing for this exact specimen selling in 2013 for over $100 more than I paid. This is the fourth time I have found a new coin of mine listed as having been sold by this particular dealer for more than I paid so I assume that his practice is to list unsold coins as having sold and then wholesaling them off to small dealers from whom I buy them. I see nothing wrong with the coin but I would not have bid on it in a sale where it was hyped as aEF (see the scratches - they showed in the 2013 photo, too). It is a nice example of the coin but why do we have to call everything EF? As far as listing coins that don't sell as sold so you can make it look like you are a hotshot dealer .... lets just say it does not make me want to deal with him. Eukratides , Baktria, 170-155 BC AE hemiobol Dioscuri riding [ATTACH=full]499663[/ATTACH] Cheapest and worst today is a coin the seller could not ID but I could so I bought it cheap (or only slightly more than something this ugly is worth). Ordinarily I would tell you the ID but it is an Alexandrian tetradrachm so I will post it here and ask JA to practice using his new Emmett book to ID it. Sure it is missing some legend but it has all the letters needed to get the name right even if you don't have the book. I would appreciate anyone owning a nicer one to post it here for comparison. Others who like ID challenges are welcome to try this one, too, but I will be out most of tomorrow so I won't be available to answer questions. I know when I bought it that it was not worth anything in the market but sometimes you just enjoy throwing money to the wind. I wonder if it could be cleaned or tooled to look better??? If the rest of the coin was as nice as the portrait, this thing would be very desirable. As it is....???? [ATTACH=full]499671[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Two new and troubling coins
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...