Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Two middle bronzes, one really lightweight, what's going on?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 4580696, member: 75937"]I have two examples of a middle bronze of Faustina Jr in my collection of the same reverse type. Nonetheless, they couldn't be more different. The first is extremely lightweight -- literally half the weight of the second -- and struck on a very thin flan. It is also slightly smaller in diameter than the second and has a die-axis of 180°. The second is of normal weight, diameter and flan thickness, and has a die-axis of 0°.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1134522[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1134523[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>The <a href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_1937-0607-66" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_1937-0607-66" rel="nofollow">example in the British Museum</a> is 13.18 g and 27.9 mm and has a die axis of 180°. It is described as a dupondius in the print edition of BMCRE (see footnote to 2202, p.383).</p><p><br /></p><p>What's going on here? Is the first an as and the second a dupondius? Both the same denomination but the first is just an anomaly? Were asses and dupondii issued with the same reverse types during the Antonine period? There are examples of this phenomenon among Antonine coins in the British Museum, but Mattingly writes, "There is no general way of distinguishing the two denominations. <i>For the most part they seem to be Asses</i> [emphasis mine]. In the case of individual specimens, weight and colour usually permit of a decision." Does die-axis say anything about the denomination or issue? I have no idea.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here are the details:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1134528[/ATTACH] </p><p>Faustina II, AD 147-175.</p><p>Roman Æ as, 6.07 g, 24.3 mm, 6 h.</p><p>Rome, AD 156-158.</p><p>Obv: FAVSTINA AVGVSTA, bare-headed and draped bust, right.</p><p>Rev: AVGVSTI PII FIL S C, Venus Victrix standing facing, head left, holding Victory on extended right hand and resting left hand on shield, set on helmet.</p><p>Refs: RIC 1389a; BMCRE 2202; Cohen 17; Strack 1333; Sear 4721.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1134527[/ATTACH] </p><p>Faustina II, AD 147-175.</p><p>Roman Æ as or dupondius, 12.05 g, 25.3 mm, 12 h.</p><p>Rome, AD 156-158.</p><p>Obv: FAVSTINA AVGVSTA, bare-headed and draped bust, right.</p><p>Rev: AVGVSTI PII FIL S C, Venus Victrix standing facing, head left, holding Victory on extended right hand and resting left hand on shield, set on helmet.</p><p>Refs: RIC 1389a; BMCRE 2202; Cohen 17; Strack 1333; Sear 4721.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 4580696, member: 75937"]I have two examples of a middle bronze of Faustina Jr in my collection of the same reverse type. Nonetheless, they couldn't be more different. The first is extremely lightweight -- literally half the weight of the second -- and struck on a very thin flan. It is also slightly smaller in diameter than the second and has a die-axis of 180°. The second is of normal weight, diameter and flan thickness, and has a die-axis of 0°. [ATTACH=full]1134522[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1134523[/ATTACH] The [URL='https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_1937-0607-66']example in the British Museum[/URL] is 13.18 g and 27.9 mm and has a die axis of 180°. It is described as a dupondius in the print edition of BMCRE (see footnote to 2202, p.383). What's going on here? Is the first an as and the second a dupondius? Both the same denomination but the first is just an anomaly? Were asses and dupondii issued with the same reverse types during the Antonine period? There are examples of this phenomenon among Antonine coins in the British Museum, but Mattingly writes, "There is no general way of distinguishing the two denominations. [I]For the most part they seem to be Asses[/I] [emphasis mine]. In the case of individual specimens, weight and colour usually permit of a decision." Does die-axis say anything about the denomination or issue? I have no idea. Here are the details: [ATTACH=full]1134528[/ATTACH] Faustina II, AD 147-175. Roman Æ as, 6.07 g, 24.3 mm, 6 h. Rome, AD 156-158. Obv: FAVSTINA AVGVSTA, bare-headed and draped bust, right. Rev: AVGVSTI PII FIL S C, Venus Victrix standing facing, head left, holding Victory on extended right hand and resting left hand on shield, set on helmet. Refs: RIC 1389a; BMCRE 2202; Cohen 17; Strack 1333; Sear 4721. [ATTACH=full]1134527[/ATTACH] Faustina II, AD 147-175. Roman Æ as or dupondius, 12.05 g, 25.3 mm, 12 h. Rome, AD 156-158. Obv: FAVSTINA AVGVSTA, bare-headed and draped bust, right. Rev: AVGVSTI PII FIL S C, Venus Victrix standing facing, head left, holding Victory on extended right hand and resting left hand on shield, set on helmet. Refs: RIC 1389a; BMCRE 2202; Cohen 17; Strack 1333; Sear 4721.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Two middle bronzes, one really lightweight, what's going on?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...