Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Mikey Zee, post: 2285058, member: 72818&quot;]I have been steadily up-grading my more modest examples of late Roman Emperor coinage, before and after Diocletian, and adding a bit of variety to the &#039;series&#039;. I found these two examples especially appealing since they had nice portraits (stylized though they may be), different mints and one, at least, had a very cool reverse; the other has a worn, weakly struck reverse, interestingly enough from the Rome mint.</p><p><br /></p><p>Billon Ant of Gallienus, 265-7 AD, Rome mint</p><p>Bust right, IMP C P LIC GALLIENVS AVG</p><p>VENVS VICTRIX; 3.67 grams, 20.26 mm</p><p>Sear 10371</p><p>[ATTACH=full]457354[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]457355[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Billon Ant of Gallienus, 260-268 AD, &#039;Syrian mint&#039;</p><p>Bust right, IMP C P LIC GALLIENVS P F AVG</p><p>PIETAS AVGG; 3.09 grams, 22.10 mm</p><p>Sear 10312[ATTACH=full]457356[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]457359[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in